<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Department of Chemistry</title>
<link href="http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/83" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/83</id>
<updated>2026-04-29T12:03:37Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T12:03:37Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>A Comprehensive Analysis of Residual Antibiotics, Organochlorine Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Beef and Chicken</title>
<link href="http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/4816" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Parvin, Nargis</name>
</author>
<id>http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/4816</id>
<updated>2026-04-19T04:07:09Z</updated>
<published>2026-04-19T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">A Comprehensive Analysis of Residual Antibiotics, Organochlorine Pesticides and Heavy Metals in Beef and Chicken
Parvin, Nargis
Bangladesh is renowned for its agriculture-based economy. The farming of poultry and&#13;
livestock is extremely popular in the country. Consumers in Bangladesh have a strong&#13;
preference for beef and chicken meat, and these products are widely available. Toxic&#13;
substances from various sources can permeate food animals through their feed and the&#13;
environment, eventually making their way through the entire food chain via&#13;
bioaccumulation and biomagnification. Additionally, these chemicals can enter the human&#13;
body through the consumption of these foods, leading to significant public health concerns.&#13;
This doctoral research focuses on identifying and measuring chemical pollutants such as&#13;
leftover antibiotics, organochlorine pesticides, and heavy metals in beef and broiler&#13;
chicken meat as well as liver samples, while assessing the health risks associated with each&#13;
contaminant. Additionally, it aims to explore potential methods for reducing these&#13;
contaminants. In this research, the presence of antibiotic residues (including tetracycline,&#13;
oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, amoxicillin, and patulin) in samples of beef meat, liver,&#13;
and chicken meat, liver was examined utilizing reversed-phase High Performance Liquid&#13;
Chromatography with a photodiode array detector (HPLC-PDA). Organochlorine&#13;
pesticides and heavy metals were assessed using Gas Chromatography with an electron&#13;
capture detector (GC-ECD) and Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS),&#13;
respectively. The beef and chicken meat and liver samples were extracted employing a&#13;
modified version of the Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS)&#13;
method designed for antibiotics and organochlorine pesticides. A total of 180 biological&#13;
samples, including beef meat, beef liver, and broiler chicken meat and liver, were collected&#13;
for this study from local markets of Dhaka North and South City, Bangladesh.&#13;
A total of one hundred and twenty samples (with 30 each of beef meat, beef liver, chicken&#13;
meat, and chicken liver) were examined for each antibiotic. The correlation coefficients (r²)&#13;
demonstrated a linear relationship, measuring 0.9978, 0.9980, and 0.9988 for&#13;
oxytetracycline, tetracycline, and chlortetracycline, respectively, across six concentration&#13;
levels. Matrix-matched calibration was performed for each matrix, resulting in linear&#13;
correlation coefficients (r²) of 0.9980, 0.9990, and 0.9981 for beef meat; 0.9985, 0.9984,&#13;
and 0.9973 for beef liver; 0.9988, 0.9982, and 0.9993 for chicken meat; and 0.9980, 0.9985,&#13;
and 0.9991 for chicken liver concerning oxytetracycline, tetracycline, and chlortetracycline,&#13;
respectively. The intra-day and inter-day recovery tests for each of the tetracyclines (TCs)&#13;
were conducted, with relative standard deviation (RSD%) remaining below 10%. The&#13;
Limit of Detection (LOD) for oxytetracycline, tetracycline, and chlortetracycline were&#13;
recorded at 1.11, 1.15, and 1.19 μg/kg, respectively, with the associated Limit of&#13;
Quantification (LOQ) being 3.17, 3.84, and 3.96 μg/kg. Residual oxytetracycline was&#13;
V&#13;
found and measured in eight beef liver samples, with levels varying from 86.76 to 368.97&#13;
μg/kg, all below the Maximum Residue Limit (MRL) set by Codex. However, one beef&#13;
liver sample surpassed the MRL established by the European Union (EU), registering at&#13;
368.97 μg/kg. Oxytetracycline was detected in three chicken meat samples (220.94, 153.45,&#13;
and 101.32 μg/kg), tetracycline was present in two samples (715.00 and 698.88 μg/kg),&#13;
and chlortetracycline was found in one sample (677.35 μg/kg). Four of the positive&#13;
samples exceeded the Codex recommended MRL, while six positive chicken meat samples&#13;
were above the MRL limit set by the EU. The linear correlation coefficient (r²) for standard&#13;
amoxicillin across six different concentrations was determined to be 0.9982. For&#13;
amoxicillin in various samples, the respective linear correlation coefficients (r²) were&#13;
0.9979 for beef meat, 0.9980 for beef liver, 0.9995 for chicken meat, and 0.9981 for&#13;
chicken liver. The intra-day and inter-day recovery experiments were conducted for&#13;
amoxicillin, yielding a relative standard deviation (RSD%) within 10%. The limit of&#13;
detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for the validated method were found to&#13;
be 0.55 and 1.84 μg/kg for standard amoxicillin, respectively. The Codex Alimentarius&#13;
Commission and the EU have established a maximum residue level (MRL) of 50 μg/kg for&#13;
amoxicillin in beef and chicken meat and liver. Residual levels of amoxicillin were&#13;
identified in seven beef meat samples, with concentrations ranging from 4.89 to 9.36 μg/kg,&#13;
and in fifteen beef liver samples, which varied from 10.39 to 89.47 μg/kg. Among the beef&#13;
liver samples, two exceeded the MRL, with values of 53.46 μg/kg (BL10) and 89.47 μg/kg&#13;
(BL14). The linear correlation coefficient (r²) was determined to be linear at 0.9991 for&#13;
standard patulin across six different concentrations. For patulin, the correlation coefficients&#13;
(r²) were found to be linear at 0.9984, 0.9983, 0.9980, and 0.9990 in beef meat, beef liver,&#13;
chicken meat, and chicken liver, respectively. An intra-day and inter-day recovery study&#13;
was conducted for patulin, and the RSD% remained within 10%. The limit of detection&#13;
(LOD) for the proposed method was established at 0.18 and 0.60 μg/kg for standard&#13;
patulin. Residual levels of patulin antibiotic (as well as mycotoxin) were identified in&#13;
twenty-five beef samples, with concentrations ranging from 47.72 to 193.91 μg/kg, and in&#13;
eighteen chicken meat samples, with levels from 16.94 to 310.53 μg/kg. Patulin was&#13;
detected in six beef liver samples, with concentrations between 43.31 and 166.91 μg/kg,&#13;
and in eleven chicken liver samples, with levels ranging from 14.75 to 52.88 μg/kg. The&#13;
health risk for each antibiotic was assessed for adults, and the hazard index (HI) was found&#13;
to be less than 1.&#13;
A total of one hundred and twenty samples (30 each of beef meat, beef liver, chicken meat,&#13;
and chicken liver) were subjected to analysis for organochlorine pesticides (OCPs). To&#13;
establish a standard calibration curve, six varying concentrations of a standard solution&#13;
(comprising 20 OCPs) were injected into the gas chromatograph-electron capture detector&#13;
VI&#13;
(GC-ECD). The correlation coefficients (r²) showed a linear relationship, with values of&#13;
0.9999, 0.9994, 0.9990, 0.9988, 0.9980, 0.9997, 0.9991, 0.9994, 0.9993, 0.9996, 0.9983,&#13;
0.9978, 0.9995, 0.9985, 0.9990, 0.9997, 0.9981, 0.9991, 0.9994, and 0.9998 for alpha-&#13;
BHC, gamma-BHC, beta-BHC, delta-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, heptachlor epoxide, transchlordane,&#13;
cis-chlordane, endosulfan I, 4, 4’-DDE, dieldrin, endrin, 4, 4’-DDD, endosulfan&#13;
II, endrin aldehyde, 4, 4’-DDT, endosulfan sulfate, methoxychlor, and endrin ketone,&#13;
respectively. Recovery experiments for intra-day and inter-day were conducted for 20&#13;
OCPs, and the relative standard deviation percentage (RSD%) remained within the&#13;
acceptable limit of 20%. Out of thirty beef meat samples tested, alpha-BHC was detected&#13;
in 11 samples (ranging from 1.01 to 62.49 μg/kg), gamma-BHC in 9 samples (with levels&#13;
from 1.22 to 103.01 μg/kg), beta-BHC in 9 samples (from 1.13 to 8.94 μg/kg), and delta-&#13;
BHC in 28 samples (with concentrations between 84.45 and 329.08 μg/kg). Heptachlor&#13;
was found in 13 samples (ranging from 0.97 to 29.64 μg/kg), while aldrin was present in&#13;
20 samples (from 0.96 to 61.71 μg/kg). Heptachlor epoxide appeared in 28 samples (with&#13;
levels from 57.87 to 304.25 μg/kg), trans-chlordane was found in 14 samples (from 0.86 to&#13;
7.90 μg/kg), and cis-chlordane in 18 samples (ranging from 0.61 to 6.22 μg/kg).&#13;
Endosulfan I was detected in 26 samples (with concentrations between 1.23 and 22.86&#13;
μg/kg), and 4, 4´-DDE was found in 20 samples (ranging from 0.17 to 21.41 μg/kg).&#13;
Dieldrin was present in 22 samples (from 0.47 to 36.50 μg/kg), endrin in 17 samples&#13;
(ranging from 0.63 to 16.98 μg/kg), and 4, 4´-DDD was detected in 23 samples (with&#13;
levels from 0.48 to 38.94 μg/kg). Endosulfan II was found in 27 samples (ranging from&#13;
1.61 to 187.29 μg/kg), and endrin aldehyde was present in 19 samples (from 0.98 to 24.70&#13;
μg/kg). Additionally, 4, 4´-DDT was detected in 15 samples (ranging from 0.24 to 76.81&#13;
μg/kg), endosulfan sulfate in 12 samples (with levels from 0.83 to 11.10 μg/kg),&#13;
methoxychlor was found in 18 samples (ranging from 0.77 to 14.04 μg/kg), and endrin&#13;
ketone was present in 4 samples (from 0.83 to 10.55 μg/kg), all measured in μg/kg. Among&#13;
the thirty beef liver samples analyzed, alpha-BHC was detected in 28 samples (ranging&#13;
from 17.40 to 340.42 μg/kg), gamma-BHC in 16 samples (from 1.75 to 15.79 μg/kg), beta-&#13;
BHC in 16 samples (from 2.87 to 42.82 μg/kg), delta-BHC in 24 samples (from 2.24 to&#13;
26.41 μg/kg), heptachlor in 22 samples (ranging from 4.67 to 16.67 μg/kg), aldrin in 21&#13;
samples (from 0.66 to 20.93 μg/kg), heptachlor epoxide in 28 samples (ranging from 65.92&#13;
to 197.61 μg/kg), trans-chlordane in 16 samples (from 0.43 to 29.68 μg/kg), cis-chlordane&#13;
in 10 samples (from 1.19 to 6.22 μg/kg), endosulfan I in 24 samples (ranging from 1.15 to&#13;
5.02 μg/kg), 4, 4´-DDE in 11 samples (from 0.10 to 3.38 μg/kg), dieldrin in 21 samples&#13;
(ranging from 1.03 to 6.43 μg/kg), endrin in 20 samples (from 1.03 to 6.43 μg/kg), 4, 4´-&#13;
DDD in 7 samples (ranging from 0.59 to 1.84 μg/kg), endosulfan II in 20 samples (from&#13;
0.22 to 25.55 μg/kg), endrin aldehyde in 26 samples (from 0.21 to 31.55 μg/kg), 4, 4´-DDT&#13;
VII&#13;
in 9 samples (ranging from 3.08 to 17.75 μg/kg), endosulfan sulfate in 2 samples (from&#13;
0.04 to 0.05 μg/kg), and methoxychlor in 8 samples (ranging from 0.26 to 11.67 μg/kg).&#13;
In the thirty chicken meat samples, alpha-BHC was detected in 2 samples (at 1.00 and 2.87&#13;
μg/kg), gamma-BHC in 1 sample (at 4.94 μg/kg), delta-BHC in 27 samples (ranging from&#13;
5.91 to 201.65 μg/kg), heptachlor in 4 samples (ranging from 6.81 to 8.93 μg/kg), aldrin in&#13;
10 samples (from 1.60 to 33.93 μg/kg), heptachlor epoxide in 25 samples (ranging from&#13;
137.76 to 270.60 μg/kg), trans-chlordane in 13 samples (from 3.64 to 27.96 μg/kg), cischlordane&#13;
in 7 samples (ranging from 0.44 to 2.24 μg/kg), endosulfan I in 25 samples&#13;
(from 1.72 to 5.91 μg/kg), 4, 4´-DDE in 2 samples (at 0.41 and 1.69 μg/kg), dieldrin in 12&#13;
samples (ranging from 0.72 to 13.53 μg/kg), endrin in 10 samples (from 0.44 to 12.73&#13;
μg/kg), 4, 4´-DDD in 17 samples (ranging from 1.48 to 5.75 μg/kg), endosulfan II in 9&#13;
samples (from 0.97 to 56.96 μg/kg), endrin aldehyde in 16 samples (ranging from 0.93 to&#13;
5.03 μg/kg), 4, 4´-DDT in 7 samples (from 1.39 to 71.84 μg/kg), endosulfan sulfate in 6&#13;
samples (ranging from 0.21 to 3.14 μg/kg), and methoxychlor in 13 samples (from 1.59 to&#13;
5.95 μg/kg). In a study of thirty chicken liver samples, alpha-BHC was detected in 23&#13;
samples, with concentrations ranging from 2.12 to 159.13 μg/kg. Gamma-BHC was&#13;
present in 3 samples, showing levels between 2.17 and 5.85 μg/kg, while beta-BHC was&#13;
found in 10 samples, with values between 13.87 and 69.96 μg/kg. Delta-BHC was&#13;
identified in 25 samples, displaying concentrations from 1.67 to 224.65 μg/kg. Heptachlor&#13;
was detected in 3 samples, at levels ranging from 3.01 to 7.78 μg/kg. Aldrin appeared in 10&#13;
samples, with concentrations varying from 0.91 to 259.93 μg/kg. Heptachlor epoxide was&#13;
found in 28 samples, with a range of 58.71 to 196.47 μg/kg. Trans-chlordane was present&#13;
in 3 samples, with levels from 5.26 to 336.49 μg/kg, and cis-chlordane was identified in 4&#13;
samples, showing concentrations between 0.12 and 280.64 μg/kg. Endosulfan I was found&#13;
in 26 samples, with values ranging from 1.23 to 22.86 μg/kg. The compound 4, 4'-DDE&#13;
was detected in 9 samples (0.54 to 12.79 μg/kg), while dieldrin was present in another 9&#13;
samples, ranging from 0.84 to 9.09 μg/kg. Endrin was found in 9 samples, with&#13;
concentrations between 1.24 and 40.29 μg/kg, and 4, 4'-DDD was detected in 10 samples,&#13;
showing levels from 0.35 to 28.90 μg/kg. Endrin aldehyde appeared in 18 samples, with&#13;
concentrations ranging from 1.12 to 307.65 μg/kg. 4, 4'-DDT was identified in 12 samples,&#13;
at levels between 1.37 and 29.80 μg/kg, while endosulfan sulfate was found in 5 samples&#13;
(0.97 to 204.26 μg/kg) and methoxychlor in another 5 samples, ranging from 0.72 to 5.68&#13;
μg/kg. Endrin ketone was present in 4 samples, with concentrations from 1.95 to 4.47&#13;
μg/kg. The health risks associated with these pesticides were assessed, revealing that the&#13;
hazard indices for delta-BHC, heptachlor, aldrin, heptachlor epoxide, endrin, endrin&#13;
aldehyde, and endrin ketone exceeded 1 for both adults and children.&#13;
VIII&#13;
A total of 120 biological samples were examined, comprising 30 each of beef meat, beef&#13;
liver, chicken meat, and chicken liver for ten heavy metals. The samples underwent&#13;
digestion with concentrated HNO3 and H2O2. In the ICP-MS, four varying concentrations&#13;
of a standard solution (a mix of the ten metals) were injected to establish calibration curves.&#13;
A linear correlation coefficient (r²) was determined for chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), lead&#13;
(Pb), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn),&#13;
and selenium (Se), with values of 0.9988, 0.9989, 0.9990, 0.9991, 0.9991, 0.9994, 0.9991,&#13;
0.9994, 0.9998, and 0.9993, respectively. The Limits of Detection (LOD) and Limits of&#13;
Quantification (LOQ) were calculated for each of the ten metals. Copper (Cu), manganese&#13;
(Mn), cobalt (Co), zinc (Zn), and selenium (Se) were detected and quantified across all&#13;
beef and chicken meat and liver samples. The concentration of Cu ranged from 2.82 x 10⁻⁵&#13;
to 1.24 x 10⁻⁴, 0.09 to 0.23, 0.93 to 4.68, and 3.94 to 12.52; Mn levels ranged from 1.77 x&#13;
10⁻³ to 6.69 x 10⁻², 7.62 to 57.28, 0.005 to 0.05, and 0.04 to 0.10; Co concentrations were&#13;
between 2.89 x 10⁻³ to 2.95 x 10⁻², 5.33 to 11.82, 0.03 to 6.28, and 2.95 to 9.18; Zn levels&#13;
varied from 0.11 to 0.55, 81.03 to 203.27, 23.70 to 41.20, and 41.26 to 152.73, while Se&#13;
was found in a range of 5.02 x 10⁻⁵ to 4.40 x 10⁻⁴, 0.38 to 1.54, 0.48 to 0.81, and 1.12 to&#13;
2.54 in all beef meat, beef liver, chicken meat, and chicken liver samples, respectively. Cr&#13;
concentrations were found to be between 2.63 x 10⁻⁵ to 3.20 x 10⁻⁴, 0.06 to 0.20, 0.58 to&#13;
1.68, and 0.32 to 1.42 in 30 beef meat, 9 beef liver, 30 chicken meat, and 30 chicken liver&#13;
samples. Ni levels varied from 2.43 x 10⁻⁵ to 9.86 x 10⁻⁵, 0.04 to 0.92, 0.10 to 1.45, and&#13;
0.06 to 42.63 in 30 beef meat, 29 beef liver, 29 chicken meat, and 30 chicken liver&#13;
respectively. Pb was found at concentrations ranging from 1.12 x 10⁻⁶ to 7.46 x 10⁻⁴, 0.05&#13;
to 24.36, 0.05 to 1.71, and 0.03 to 5.28 in 30 beef meat, 29 beef liver, 26 chicken meat, and&#13;
22 chicken liver. Cd levels were detected between 4.82 x 10⁻⁶ to 5.61 x 10⁻⁴, 0.04 to 1.17,&#13;
0.14 to 0.18, and 0.04 to 0.24 in 30 beef meat, 12 beef liver, 2 chicken meat, and 3 chicken&#13;
liver respectively. As concentration ranged from 1.34 x 10⁻⁶ to 4.41 x 10⁻⁴, 0.01 to 0.69,&#13;
0.005 to 0.52, and 0.005 to 10.79 mg/kg in 30 beef meat, 28 beef liver, 19 chicken meat,&#13;
and 24 chicken liver samples respectively. The health risk assessment (EDI, THQ, HI,&#13;
TCR) for heavy metals was conducted for both adults and children. Chemical pollutants&#13;
can build up in the fatty tissues of beef and poultry, potentially changing the fatty acid&#13;
profile and causing genetic mutations. Therefore, the fatty acid composition and overall fat&#13;
content were examined using gas chromatography with a flame ionization detector (GCFID).&#13;
The average fat content (%) calculated was 1.57, 6.19, 0.78, and 2.95% for beef meat,&#13;
beef liver, broiler chicken meat, and liver, respectively. This research underscores&#13;
comprehensive evidence of the occurrence of antibiotic, pesticide, and heavy metal&#13;
residues in raw beef and broiler chicken meat and liver in Bangladesh. Although most&#13;
samples were within internationally accepted limits, several exceeded Codex and EU&#13;
MRLs, posing potential public health concerns.
This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2026-04-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Particle Phase Organic Compounds in the Atmospheric Particulate Matter at Urban and Rural Areas in Bangladesh</title>
<link href="http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/4782" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Islam, Md. Nazrul</name>
</author>
<id>http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/4782</id>
<updated>2026-03-02T05:48:00Z</updated>
<published>2026-03-02T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Particle Phase Organic Compounds in the Atmospheric Particulate Matter at Urban and Rural Areas in Bangladesh
Islam, Md. Nazrul
Particle Phase Organic Compounds (PPOCs) are significant organic fraction of&#13;
atmospheric suspended particulate matter. They comprise of harmful chemicals&#13;
which have adverse effects on human health. There is very limited research regarding&#13;
the source, seasonal variation and health impact of PPOCs in Bangladesh. The&#13;
objectives of this study are to measure the 16 PPOCs at four different locations with&#13;
seasonal variation, correlation coefficient, source identification with positive matrix&#13;
factorization (PMF), influence of wind direction with backward air mass trajectory&#13;
analysis by HYSPLIT and potential health risk assessment. In this study, suspended&#13;
particulate matter samples have collected on quartz filters with a low volume sampler&#13;
(Model: 700) at four locations in Bangladesh (Dhaka, Rajshahi, Narayangonj and&#13;
Bhola) for one year at each location between January, 2016 and February, 2020.&#13;
Concentration of 16 organic compounds (Naphthalene, Anthracene, Diazinon,&#13;
Deltamethrin, Pyrabenzoxime, Pyrazosulfuran, Prophenophos, Butachlor,&#13;
Propiconazole, Cymoxanil, Cypermethrin, Lamdacyhalothrin, Dimethoate,&#13;
Chlorpyriphos, Carbofuran, and Metalaxyl) were determined with a Gas&#13;
Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). The total average PPOCs&#13;
concentration was 11.60 ± 0.1 μgm-³ in Dhaka, 8.69± 0.3 μgm-³ in Rajshahi,&#13;
11.84±0.4 μgm-³ in Narayangonj and 7.22± 0.2 μgm-³ in Bhola. These concentrations&#13;
were 2 to 18 times higher during winter season than that of monsoon season. The&#13;
PPOCs concentration was similar between Dhaka and Narayangonj and it was 32%&#13;
higher than Rajshahi and Bhola. Source apportionment by Positive Matrix&#13;
Factorization (PMF) revealed five sources of PPOCs - diesel exhaust, biomass&#13;
burning, industrial emission, gasoline exhaust, and other sources. Industrial emission&#13;
was predominant in urban areas whereas biomass burning was the major pollution&#13;
vi&#13;
source in rural areas. Backward air mass trajectory analysis by Hybrid Single-Particle&#13;
Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) indicated that during winter more than&#13;
half of the period wind (60%) comes entirely from the Indo- Gangetic Plain (IGP)&#13;
region originating from Africa. In monsoon, half of the wind&#13;
(50%) comes entirely from the Indian Ocean through the Bay of Bengal. According&#13;
to the health risk assessment study, 16 PPOCs had a Hazard Index (HI) value of&#13;
30.19, indicating a serious non-carcinogenic effect. The largest contributor to the&#13;
hazard index (32%) was dimethoate. One in 340 people had a chance of getting cancer&#13;
in their lifetime. The average lifetime cancer risk value (2.9410-3) was higher than&#13;
the US Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) recommended threshold (110-&#13;
4). Naphthalene was found to pose the highest carcinogenic risk. As particulate phase&#13;
organic compounds are mostly emitted from anthropogenic sources and pose severe&#13;
health threat, so public awareness should be raised and more detailed research should&#13;
be conducted in local and regional level.
This thesis is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2026-03-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>STUDY OF THE EMISSION OF METHANE FROM THE RICE FIELDS  AND WETLANDS OF BANGLADESH AND ITS INHIBITION BY  ORGANOMETALLIC COMPLEXES SYNTHESIZED  FROM NEEM TREE LEAVES EXTRACTS</title>
<link href="http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/4721" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>MANDEL, MD. SOFIQUL ISLAM</name>
</author>
<id>http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/4721</id>
<updated>2025-09-07T04:14:59Z</updated>
<published>2025-09-07T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">STUDY OF THE EMISSION OF METHANE FROM THE RICE FIELDS  AND WETLANDS OF BANGLADESH AND ITS INHIBITION BY  ORGANOMETALLIC COMPLEXES SYNTHESIZED  FROM NEEM TREE LEAVES EXTRACTS
MANDEL, MD. SOFIQUL ISLAM
The concentration of Methane in Earth's atmosphere is reported &#13;
to be inoreasing on the basis of the results obtained by means of &#13;
a variety of independent measurements attributed to the emission &#13;
from rice growing regions. To understand the global budget of &#13;
atmospheric methane, intensive research on individual methane &#13;
sources are required to be investigated and integrated for arriving &#13;
at a definite conclusion. Attempts have, therefore, been made for &#13;
measuring methane emission from different rice fields of different &#13;
places in Bangladesh. Methene emission observed were of highest &#13;
magnitude in the last 2-3 weeks before harvest. Hourly emissions &#13;
have been observed to be 27.21 mg. m"2hr_1 and the emissions have &#13;
been found to vary with the paddy varieties, geographical location, &#13;
soil group, soil texture and structure, soil temperature, soil pH, &#13;
ambient temperature and various other factors.Effect of different &#13;
parameters on methane effluxes have been discussed. A correlation &#13;
of plant growth on methane emissions has been formulated.&#13;
 In order to study the mitigation measures for the suppression &#13;
or reduction of methane emission from the rice fields, &#13;
investigations with the natural pesticides were carried out in the &#13;
laboratory and then applied in the field experiments. For this &#13;
purpose the extracts of Neem tree components (Azadirachta Indica)&#13;
and some metalcomplexes of the extracted components were used. &#13;
Petroleum ether, EtOAc, MeOH and also aqueous extracts of &#13;
AZADIRACHTA INDICA leaf showed insecticidal effect towards house&#13;
 flies while petroleum ether extract exhibited only repelling effect &#13;
against mosquitoes and insecticidal effect on lice. Attempts were &#13;
made to effect complexation of the extracts with metal ions like &#13;
Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) and the extracts were subjected to &#13;
chromatography to yield a number of compounds. The IR spectral data &#13;
of these compounds have been discussed. In the laboratory &#13;
experiments the extracts was found to be effective
This thesis is submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy
</summary>
<dc:date>2025-09-07T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ISOLATION AND CHARACTERISATION OF  SOME COMPOUNDS FROM  CENTELLA ASIATICA</title>
<link href="http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/4713" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>NAHAR, NURUN</name>
</author>
<id>http://reposit.library.du.ac.bd:8080/xmlui/xmlui/handle/123456789/4713</id>
<updated>2025-09-01T05:51:26Z</updated>
<published>2025-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">ISOLATION AND CHARACTERISATION OF  SOME COMPOUNDS FROM  CENTELLA ASIATICA
NAHAR, NURUN
This thesis is submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy.
</summary>
<dc:date>2025-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
